- More concentrated markets dominated by few large poultry producers
- Poultry production zones with hygiene and bio-security criteria for participation
- Diminishing numbers of wet markets, with the trend to move these out of urban areas.
- Tougher inspections to gain production/trading licenses
- Improved fencing and housing of poultry.
Such restructuring, although necessary to prevent the outbreaks of H5N1 has the potential to jeopardize the livelihoods of small scale farmers and backyard poultry raisers as they are pushed out of the poultry sector. NGOs and similar organizations can play a role in supporting such communities to improve their overall poultry production and standards of bio security. They can also advocate for government prevention measures that are suitable to small scale farmers and ensure the protection of their livelihoods.
The table below, taken from the same FAO document, also provides some convincing data to support our focus upon decreasing the vulnerability of the backyard poultry raisers:
Poultry systems in five South East Asian countries affected by HPAI in 2003-5 | ||||
Country | Industrial | Large commercial | Small commercial | Backyard |
| | <> | <> | 99.9% farms, 90% poultry |
| 3.5 % poultry, export & national consumption | 21.2% poultry | 11.8% poultry | 63.4% poultry |
Lao PDR | | Small | 10% poultry | 90% poultry |
| 70% production export important | 20% production | 10% production, 98+% producers | |
| Small | 20-25% production, few producers | 10-15% production, few producers | 65% production possibly 70% of poultry |
Source: Rushton et al (forthcoming) |
No comments:
Post a Comment